Assessing the quality of state disaster recovery plans: Implications for policy and practice

Dylan Sandler, MRP; Gavin Smith, PhD

doi:10.5055/jem.2013.0144

Authors

Dylan Sandler, MRP
Gavin Smith, PhD

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2013.0144

Keywords:

long-term recovery, disaster recovery, plan quality analysis, resiliency

Abstract

Pre-event planning for postdisaster recovery helps to improve recovery outcomes following disasters by engaging the network of stakeholders involved in recovery and working to develop a degree of consensus around recovery priorities. States serve as a linchpin between local communities and federal agencies, and the development of comprehensive state recovery plans allows states to communicate recovery goals and decision-making processes. This article addresses the limitations of what we know about the role of the state in disaster recovery by describing the application of a plan quality evaluation tool to a sample of state recovery plans. The plans evaluated in this study tended to be heavily focused on federal and state programs and grants available following disasters. To effectively guide recovery decision-making and encourage community resilience, state recovery plans should help to set a direction for recovery and develop corresponding policies that may be implemented by the broad network of stakeholders involved in recovery.

Author Biographies

Dylan Sandler, MRP

Research Assistant, Department of Homeland Security, Coastal Hazards Center of Excellence - Research Lead, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Gavin Smith, PhD

Associate Research Professor, Department of Homeland Security, Coastal Hazards Center of Excellence - Research Lead. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

References

Smith GP: Planning for Post-Disaster Recovery: A Review of the United States Disaster Assistance Framework.Washington, DC: Island Press, 2011.

Comfort LK, Birkland TA, Cigler BA, et al.: Retrospective and prospective on Hurricane Katrina: Five years and counting. Publ Admin Rev. 2010; 70(5): 669-678.

Olshansky RB, Johnson LA: Clear as Mud: Planning for the Rebuilding of New Orleans. Chicago: American Planning Association, 2010.

Durham T, Suiter L: Perspectives and roles of the state and federal governments. In: Drabek L, Hoetmer, G (ed.): Emergency Management Principles and Practice for Local Government. New York,NY: International City Management Association, 1991: 101-127.

Waugh WL, Sylves RT: The intergovernmental relations of emergency management. In: Sylves RT, Waugh WL (eds.): Disaster Management in the U.S. and Canada, 2nd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1996: 46-48.

Smith GP, Wenger D: Sustainable disaster recovery: Operationalizing an existing framework. In: Rodriguez H, Quarantelli E, Dynes R (eds.): Handbook of Disaster Research. New York, NY: Springer, 2006: 234-257.

National Governors Association: Comprehensive Emergency Management: A Governor’s Guide. Washington, DC: National Governors Association, 1998.

Berke PR, Beatley T: After the Hurricane: Linking Recovery to Sustainable Development in the Caribbean. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.

Schwab J, Topping KC, Eadie CC, et al.: Planning for Post-Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction. Chicago: American Planning Association, 1998.

Olshansky RB: Planning after Hurricane Katrina. J Am Planning Assoc. 2006; 72(2): 147-153.

Colten CE, Kates RW, Laska SB: Community resilience: Lessons from New Orleans and Hurricane Katrina. CARRI Report 3, Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2008.

Berke PR, Kartez J, Wenger D: Recovery after disasters: Achieving sustainable development, mitigation and equity. Disasters. 1993; 17(2): 93-109.

Godschalk DR: Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities. Nat Hazards Rev. 2003; 4(3): 136-142.

Peacock WG, Morrow BH, Gladwin H: Hurricane Andrew and the Reshaping of Miami: Ethnicity, Gender, and the Socio-Political Ecology of Disasters. Gainsville, FL: University Press of Florida, 1997.

Beatley T: The vision of sustainable communities. In: Burby RJ (ed.): Cooperating With Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards With Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press, 1998: 233-262.

Beatley T: Planning for Coastal Resilience: Best Practices for Calamitous Times.Washington, DC: Island Press, 2009.

U.S. Government Accountability Office: Disaster recovery: Past experiences offer insights for recovering from Hurricanes Ike and Gustav and other recent natural disasters (GAO-08-1120). Report to the Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs, U.S. Senate. Washington DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2008.

Smith GP, Sandler DS, Flatt V, et al.: Assessing the disaster recovery planning capacity of the state of North Carolina. Prepared by RTI International – Institute for Homeland Security Solutions under contract HSHQDC-08-C-00100, Durham, NC, 2011.

Berke PR, Godschalk DR: Searching for the good plan: A meta-analysis of plan quality studies. J Planning Literature. 2009; 23(3): 227-240.

Berke PR, French SP: The influence of state planning mandates on local plan quality. J Planning Educ Res. 1994; 13(fall): 237-250.

Berke PR, Smith GP, Lyles W: State hazard mitigation plan evaluation and model practices. Report to the Department of Homeland Security, Chapel Hill, NC, 2009.

Godschalk DR, Beatley T, Berke PR, et al.: Natural Hazard Mitigation: Recasting Disaster Policy and Planning. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1999.

Smith GP, Lyles W, Berke PR: The role of the state in building local capacity and commitment for hazard mitigation planning. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2013 (in press).

Brody S: Are we learning to make better plans? A longitudinal analysis of plan quality associated with natural hazards. J Planning Educ Res. 2003; 23(2): 191-201.

Lyles W, Berke PR, Smith GP: Evaluation of local hazard mitigation plan quality. Report to the Department of Homeland Security, Chapel Hill, NC, 2012.

Brower DJ, Beatley T, Schwab AK: An Introduction to Coastal Zone Management, 2nd ed.Washington, DC: Island Press, 2002.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: Population trends along the coastal United States 1980-2008, 2007. Available at http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/programs/mb/pdfs/coastal_pop_trends_complete.pdf. Accessed March 12, 2012.

Krippendorf K: Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Hum Commun Res. 2004; 30(3): 411-433.

Spangle W, Meehan R, Degenkolb H, et al.: Pre-Event Planning for Post-Earthquake Rebuilding. Los Angeles, CA: Southern California Earthquake Preparedness, 1987.

Peacock WG, Kunreuther H, Hooke WH, et al.:Toward a resiliency and vulnerability observatory network: RAVON. HRRC reports; 08-02R, 2008. Available at archone.tamu.edu/hrrc/publications/researchreports/RAVON. Accessed March 20, 2012.