The social construction of disasters in the United States: A historical and cultural phenomenon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2017.0326Keywords:
social construction, disasters, language, CultureAbstract
Introduction: Societal risks from hazards are continually increasing. Each year, disasters cause thousands of deaths and cost billions of dollars. In the first half of 2011, the United States endured countless disasters—winter snowstorms in the Midwest and Northeast; severe tornadic weather in the Mississippi, Alabama, and Missouri; flash flooding in Nashville; flooding along the Mississippi River; an earthquake on the East Coast, wildfires in Texas, and Hurricane Irene. Fundamental disaster planning is regarded as an interdisciplinary approach to develop strategies and instituting policies concerned with phases of emergency management; as such, its needs are predicated on the identification of hazards and assessment of risks.
Problem: Even if the probability or intensity of risks to disasters remains fairly constant, population growth, alongside economic and infrastructural development, will unavoidably result in a concomitant increase of places prone to such events. One of the greatest barriers to emergency management efforts is the failure to fully grasp the socially and politically constructed meaning of disasters.
Purpose: This article investigates the ways in which language has been used historically in the American lexicon to make sense of disasters in the United States in an effort to improve communal resiliency. Serving as both an idea and experience, the terminology used to convey our/the modern-day concept of disaster is a result of a cultural artifact, ie, a given time and specific place.
Methodology: Tools such as Google Ngram Viewer and CASOS AutoMap are used to explore the penetration, duration, and change in disaster terminology among American English literature for more than 200 years, from 1800 to 2008, by quantifying written culture.
Findings: The language of disasters is an integral part of disaster response, as talking is the primary way that most people respond to and recover from disasters. The vast majority of people are not affected by any given disaster, and so it is through discussing a disaster that people make sense of it, respond, and react to it, and fit something that is overwhelming and beyond human control into the normal order of life.
References
Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, et al.: At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters. New York: Routledge, 1994.
Haddow GD, Bullock J, Cappola DP: Introduction to Emergency Management, Homeland Security Series. 3rd ed. New York: Elsevier, 2008.
Petak WJ: Emergency management: A challenge for public administration. Public Adm Rev. 1985; SI: 3-7.
Waugh WL: Living with Hazards, Dealing with Disasters: An Introduction to Emergency Management. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe Inc., 2000.
Paton D, Jackson D: Developing disaster management capability: An assessment centre approach. Disaster Prev Manage. 2002; 11(2): 115-122.
Mushkatel A, Weschler L: Emergency management and the intergovernmental system. Public Adm Rev. 1985; SI: 49-56.
Steinberg T: Acts of God: The Unnatural History of Natural Disasters in America. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Abbott P: Natural Disasters. 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2004.
Boin A, McConnell A: Preparing for critical infrastructure breakdowns: The limits of crisis management and the need for resilience. J Contingencies Crisis Manage. 2007; 15(1): 50-59.
Patterson O, Weil F, Patel K: The role of community in disaster response: Conceptual models. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2010; 29: 127-141.
Birkland T: Natural disaster as focusing events: Policy communities and political response. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1996; 14(2): 221-243.
Sylves R: Disaster Policy and Politics: Emergency Management and Homeland Security. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2008.
Simon H: Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1969.
Farmer D: The Language of Public Administration: Bureaucracy, Modernity and Postmodernity. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1995.
White JD: Taking Language Seriously: The Narrative Foundations of Public Administration Research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1999.
Farmer D: Public Administration in Perspective: Theory and Practice Through Multiple Lenses. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2010.
Etzioni A: Creating good communities and good societies. Contemp Sociol. 2000; 29(1): 188-195.
Etzioni A: A moderate communitarian proposal. Political Theory. 1996; 24(2): 151-171.
Nie N, Verba S, Petrocik J: The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.
Blunt A: Cultural geography: Cultural geographies of home. Prog Human Geogr. 2005; 29(4): 505-515.
Erikson R, Tedin K: American Public Opinion: Its Origins, Content, and Impact. 7th ed. New York: Pearson Education, Inc., 2007.
Wamsley G: A public philosophy and ontological disclosure as the basis for normatively grounded theorizing in public administration. In Wamsley G, Wolf J (eds.): Refounding Democratic Public Administration, Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996: 359.
Neaves T, Feierabend N, Butts C, et al.: A portrait of the delta: Enduring hope and despair. J Health Human Serv Adm. 2008; 31(1): 10-29.
Weeks J: Population: An Introduction to Concepts and Issues. 8th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Learning, 2002.
Stoneall L: Country Life, City Life: Five Theories of Community. New York: Praeger, 1983.
Tönnies F: Community and Society: Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft. Edison, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1988.
Wilson J: The moral sense. Am Political Sci Rev. 1993; 87(1): 1-11.
Fitzpatrick K, LaGory M: Unhealthy Places: The Ecology of Risk in the Urban Landscape, New York: Routledge, 2001.
Gilligan C: Moral orientation and moral development. In Kitlay E, Meyos D (eds.): Women and Moral Theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1987: 19-36.
Rozario K: The Culture of Calamity: Disaster and the Making of Modern America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2007.
Hoffman SM, Oliver-Smith A: Catastrophe and Culture: The Anthropology of Disaster. Santa Fe, NM: School of the American Press, 2002.
Mileti D: Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.
Drabek TE, McIntire DA: Emergent phenomena and the sociology of disaster: Lessons, trends and opportunities from the research literature. Disaster Prev Manage. 2003; 12(2): 97-112.
Rodriguez H, Barnshaw J: The social construction of disasters: From heat waves to worst-case scenarios. Contemporary Sociol. 2006; 35(3): 218-223.
Cannon T: Vulnerability analysis and the explanation of ‘natural’ disasters.” In Varley A (ed.): Disasters, Development, and Environment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, 1994: 13-30.
Dyrnes RR, Tierney KJ: Disasters, Collective Behavior, and Social Organization. Neward, DE: University of Delaware Press, 1994.
Birkland T: After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1997.
Birkland T: Lessons of Disaster: Policy Change after Catastrophic Events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2007.
Campbell J: Map Use and Analysis. 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2001.
de Blij H, Alexander A: Culture, Society, and Space. 7th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2000.
Merriam-Webester: Dictionary. Available at http://www.merriam-webster.com/. Accessed August 3, 2016.
MacMillan: Dictionary. Available at http://www.macmillandictionary.com/us/thesaurus-category/american/general-words-meaning-natural-disaster. Accessed November 1, 2016.
Michel JB, Shen YK, Aiden AP, et al.: Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science. 2011; 331(6014): 176-182.
Bohannon J: Google opens books to new cultural studies. Science. 2010; 330: 1600.
Google Books: Google Books Ngram Viewer. Available at https://books.google.com/ngrams/info. Accessed May 30, 2016.
New York Times: The Michigan Fires: Interesting letter from Hon. William A. Howard to Alexander H. Rice. The New York Times. November 4, 1871: 4.
New York Times: The Wisconsin Fires: Additional particulars of the unusual phenomena attending them. The New York Times. November 13, 1871: 8.
New York Times: The Great North-West Fire: An examination of its causes and extent. Retrieve 9/13/2011 from: ProQuest Historical Newspapers. The New York Times. November 20, 1871: 8.
New York Times: The death list hourly increasing—Names of three hundred of the unfortunates. The New York Times. October 19, 1871: 5.
Chicago Daily Tribune: Galveston appeals to the country. Chicago Tribune. September 12, 1900: 3.
Chicago Daily Tribune: Pleas for aid are issued: Governors and mayors announce distress in Texas and ask subscriptions—Much money forwarded. Chicago Tribune. September 12, 1900: 3.
Chicago Daily Tribune: Tribune-legion fund for storm relief reaches $23,238: Checks and cash rolling in to aid tornado. Chicago Tribune. March 21, 1925: 4.
Chicago Daily Tribune: Eye witnesses tell of horror.: Descriptions of the wild panic which followed the first earthquake. Chicago Tribune. April 20, 1906: 4.
Chicago Daily Tribune: The Pennsylvania horror. Chicago Tribune. June 2, 1889: 4.
Gregory R, McDaniels T, Fields D: Decision-aiding, not dispute resolution: Creating insights through structured environmental decisions. J Policy Anal Manage. 2001; 20(3): 415-432.
Henstra D: Evaluating local government emergency management programs: What framework should public managers adopt. Public Adm Rev. 2010; 70(2): 236-246.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright 2007-2023, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC and Journal of Emergency Management. All Rights Reserved
