When emergencies and disasters collide: Lessons from the response to the Magna, Utah earthquake during the COVID-19 pandemic





COVID-19, earthquake, complex responses, emergency management functions


The following article addresses the complexities of responding to the Magna, Utah earthquake under conditions of the global corona virus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. The article begins with a brief mention of the literature on complex disasters along with the research methods employed for the study. Contextual information about COVID-19 and the Magna earthquake are then provided along with general issues that had to be addressed in the public health emergency and after the seismic hazard occurred. The following two sections identify how COVID-19 benefited the response to the earthquake as well as how the virus complicated operations after the tremor. The article then discusses major lessons of this research and provides recommendations for future study and practice. Overall, this research reveals that the responses to these two simultaneous events witnessed successes as well as significant challenges. The appearance of COVID-19 may have limited injuries or the loss of life during the Magna earthquake, and it also enabled an early activation of the emergency operations center (EOC). However, COVID-19 presented unique challenges for evacuation, sheltering, and damage assessment functions. The pandemic also altered the nature of EOC operations, created the need for a virtual response, and had distinct implications for financial accounting and personnel workload.

Author Biography

David A. McEntire, PhD

Professor, Department of Emergency Services, and Center for National Security Studies, Utah Valley University, Orem, Utah


Burton I, Kates R, White G: The Environment as Hazard. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978.

Channell DF: The History of Engineering Science: An Annotated Bibliography. Bibliographies in the History of Science and Technology. New York/London: Garland Publishing, 1989.

Burby RJ: Cooperating with Nature: Confront Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press, 1989.

Drabek TE: Human System Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986.

Mileti D: Natural Hazard Warning Systems in the United States. Boulder, CO: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, 1975.

Quarantelli EL: Evacuation Behavior and Problems: Findings and Implications from the Research Literature. Columbus, OH: Disaster Research Center, Ohio State University, 1980.

Quarantelli EL: General and particular observations on sheltering and housing in American disasters. Disasters. 2010; 6(4): 277-281.

Dynes RR: Community emergency planning: False assumptions and inappropriate analogies. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1994; 12(2): 141-158.

Neal D, Phillips B: Effective emergency management: Reconsidering the bureaucratic approach. Disasters. 1995; 19(4): 327-337.

Perry RW: The structure and function of emergency operations centers. Disaster Prev Manag. 1995; 4(5): 37-41.

Drabek TE, McEntire DA: Emergent phenomena and multi-organizational coordination in disasters: Lessons from the research literature. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2003; 20(2): 197-224.

McEntire DA: Introduction to Homeland Security: Understanding Terrorism from an Emergency Management Perspective. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2018.

Houston JB, Hawthorne J, Perreault MF, et al.: Social media and disasters: A functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response and research. Disasters. 2015; 39(1): 1-22.

Knox C, Haupt B: Incorporating cultural competency skills in emergency management education. Disaster Prevent Manag. 2015; 24(5): 619-634.

Holguin-Veras J, Jaller M, Van Wassenhove LN, et al.: On the unique features of post-disaster humanitarian logistics. J Oper Manag. 2014; 30(7-8): 494-506.

Zhang X, Li H: Urban resilience and urban sustainability: What we know and what we don’t know. Cities. 2018; 72(A): 141-148.

McEntire DA: The Dallas Ebola incident as an indicator of the bioterrorism threat: An assessment of response with implications for security and preparedness. UVU J Natl Secur. 2019; 3(2): 5-18.

Quarantelli EL: The environmental disasters of the future will be more and worse, but the prospect is not hopeless. Disaster Prevent Manag. 1993; 2(1): 11-25.

Quarantelli EL: What is a Disaster? Perspectives on the Question. New York: Routledge, 1998.

Bissell R, Jensen S, Feldman-Jensen S: Preparedness and Response to Catastrophic Disasters. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2013.

Perrow C: Disasters ever more? Reducing US vulnerabilities. In Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer, 2007.

Lagadec P: Crisis management in the twenty-first century: ‘Unthinkable’ events in “inconceivable” contexts. In Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer, 2007.

Cruz AM: Natech risk and management: An assessment of the state of the art. Nat Hazards. 2008; 46(2): 143-152.

Cutter SL: Compound, cascading or complex disasters: What’s in a name? Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev. 2018; 60(6): 16-25.

Yin RK: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Comfort LK: Shared Risk: Complex Systems in Seismic Response. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing, 1999.

Alexander DE: The ‘Titanic syndrome’: Risk and crisis management on the Costa Concordia. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag. 2012; 9(1): Article 33.

Rice D: 5.7 Magnitude earthquake hits Salt Lake City, area, unnerving residents. USA Today. March 18, 2020. Available at https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/03/18/utahearthquake-5-7-magnitude-earthquake-hits-utah/2863406001/. Accessed December 7, 2020.

Cramer M, Diaz J: 5.7-Magnitude earthquake hits near Salt Lake City: ‘the last thing we need right now’. New York Times. March 18, 2020. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/18/us/earthquake-utah-salt-lake-city.html. Accessed December 7, 2020.

Maffly B, Carlisle N: Utah’s earthquake took its toll on at least 77 historic buildings. Salt Lake Tribune. March 20, 2020. Available at https://www.sltrib.com/news/2020/03/20/salt-lake-citys-brick/. Accessed December 7, 2020.

Locklear M: Magna earthquake caused more than $20 million in damage, county says. KUTV. April 15, 2020. Available at https://kutv.com/news/local/magna-earthquake-caused-more-than-20-million-in-damage-county-says. Accessed December 7, 2020.

Dunphey K: Mobile home residents grapple with extensive damage after Utah earthquake. Deseret News. March 19, 2020. Available at https://www.deseret.com/utah/2020/3/19/21187388/western-estate-mobile-home-magna-west-valley-extensive-damageearthquake. Accessed December 7, 2020.

Enterprise: Loan fund established to help magna repair damages caused by March’s earthquake. Enterprise Business Journal. May 10, 2020. Available at https://slenterprise.com/index.php/news/latest-news/3718-loan-fund-established-to-help-magna-repair-damages-caused-by-march-s-earthquake. Accessed December 7, 2020.



How to Cite

McEntire, PhD, D. A. “When Emergencies and Disasters Collide: Lessons from the Response to the Magna, Utah Earthquake During the COVID-19 Pandemic”. Journal of Emergency Management, vol. 19, no. 7, Oct. 2021, pp. 19-37, doi:10.5055/jem.0615.