Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Feasibility study: Proposed alternative to N95 respirator during the personal protective equipment shortage from COVID-19 pandemic

Ahel El Haj Chehade, MD, Jesintha Stephenson, MD, Evan Floyd, PhD, Jean Keddissi, MD, FCCP, Tony Abdo, MD, Sharanjeet Thind, MD, Jamie Stringfellow, RRT, Houssein Youness, MD, FCCP

Abstract


Introduction: Having an adequate supply of personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic has been a constant challenge for hospitals across the United States. In the event of shortages, our assembled mask might offer noninferior protection compared to an N95 respirator.

Objective: To study the ability of an assembled mask to pass a quantitative fit testing.

Methods: We conducted a feasibility study at the Oklahoma City Veteran Affairs Health Care System. Volunteers were fitted with an assembled mask made of either a Hans Rudolph half-face mask or a Respironics Performax full-face mask, attached to an Iso-Gard HEPA light Filter 28022 through a Performax SE elbow hinge. Quantitative fit testing was conducted using the Occupation Safety and Health Administration fit testing protocol. The primary outcome was the percentage of participants who pass the quantitative fit test. Secondary outcomes included the overall fit factor (FF), average FF for different exercises, changes in pulse oximetry and endtidal CO2 at 0 and 15 minutes, willingness to use the mask, and visibility assessment.

Results: Twenty participants completed the study, and all (100 percent) passed the quantitative fit testing. The overall FF had a geometric mean of 2,317 (range: 208-16,613) and a geometric standard deviation of 3.8. The lowest FF was recorded while the subjects were talking. Between time 0 and 15 minutes, there was no clinically significant change in pulse oximetry and end-tidal CO2 levels. Most participants reported “very good” visibility and were “highly likely” to use the Hans Rudolph half-face mask in the case of shortage.

Conclusion: Our assembled respirator offers noninferior protection to N95 respirators in the setting of hypothetical protective equipment shortage.


Keywords


COVID-19, pandemic, personal protective equipment, respirator

Full Text:

PDF

References


WHO Timeline-COVID-19. 2020. Available at https://www.who.int/news/item/27-04-2020-who-timeline---covid-19. Accessed August 11, 2021.

Ranney ML, Griffeth V, Jha AK. Critical supply shortages—The need for ventilators and personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(18): E41.

Using Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). CDC. 2020. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/usingppe.html. Accessed August 11, 2021.

Recommended guidance for extended use and limited reuse of N95 filtering facepiece respirators in healthcare settings. CDC. 2020. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/hcwcontrols/recommendedguidanceextuse.html#background. Accessed August 11, 2021.

Carlos Rubio-Romero J, Del Carmen Pardo-Ferreira M, Antonio Torrecilla Garcia J, et al. Disposable masks: Disinfection and sterilization for reuse, and non-certified manufacturing, in the face of shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic. Saf Sci. 2020; 129: 104830-104830.

Emanuel EJ, Persad G, Upshur R, et al. Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of COVID-19. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(21): 2049-2055.

Medical Advisory Secretariat. Air cleaning technologies: An evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005; 5(17): 1-52.

OSHA. Fit testing procedures—General requirements. 1988. Available at https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.134AppA. Accessed August 11, 2021.

https://www.med.navy.mil/sites/nmcphc/Documents/industrialhygiene/RESPIRATOR-FIT-TESTING.pdf.

Offeddu V, Yung CF, Low MSF, et al. Effectiveness of masks and respirators against respiratory infections in healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2017; 65(11): 1934-1942.

Cheng VCC, Wong SC, Kwan GSW, et al. Disinfection of N95 respirators by ionized hydrogen peroxide during pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to SARS-CoV-2. J Hosp Infect. 2020; 105(2): 358-359.

Degesys NF, Wang RC, Kwan E, et al. Correlation between N95 extended use and reuse and fit failure in an emergency department. JAMA. 2020; 324: 94.

Han DH, Willeke K, Colton CE. Quantitative fit testing techniques and regulations for tight-fitting respirators: Current methods measuring aerosol or air leakage, and new developments. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1997; 58(3): 219-228.

Hwang SY, Yoon H, Yoon A, et al. N95 filtering facepiece respirators do not reliably afford respiratory protection during chest compression: A simulation study. Am J Emerg Med. 2020; 38(1): 12-17.

Wong P, Kim Ong SG, Lim WY. COVID-19 and cardiopulmonary resuscitation: The recommended N95 mask may not be adequate. Br J Anaesth. 2020; 125: E319-E322. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.1005.1008.

Gralton J, McLaws M-L. Protecting healthcare workers from pandemic influenza: N95 or surgical masks? Crit Care Med. 2010; 38(2): 657-667.

Floyd EL, Henry JB, Johnson DL. Influence of facial hair length, coarseness, and areal density on seal leakage of a tight-fitting half-face respirator. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2018; 15(4): 334-340.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0611

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Emergency Management